Heard folks chatting about Euro 2020 predictions and where to find good ones. Figured I’d actually try some sites myself, see which ones held up, you know? Just rolled up my sleeves and jumped in.
Started My Hunt
First thing, I googled something like “best euro 2020 betting predictions”. Tons popped up, way too many. Looked overwhelming honestly. Decided I needed some kind of system, so I just made a quick list on paper. Wrote down sites folks mentioned often on forums. Aimed for maybe ten, but stopped at five that seemed decent.
Trying Them Out One by One
Made a little chart in a notebook. Columns for Site Name, Ease of Use, Types of Predictions, Odds They Offered, How They Explained Stuff, and My Gut Feeling. Then started clicking.
- Site One: Felt kinda old? Layout was messy. Found their predictions easy enough, but wow, the odds they showed seemed really low. Like, worse than everyone else. Didn’t see much reasoning either – just “Italy to win” kinda thing. Felt sketchy. Marked it down.
- Site Two: This one looked slick, modern website. Found nice features – stats, player info, the whole deal. Predictions were there too. But… digging deeper, their actual win-rate prediction? Couldn’t really find solid proof it was better before the tournament. They talked a big game, but was it real? Made me question it.
- Site Three: Okay, this one focused hard on the data. Charts, graphs, percentages flying everywhere. Felt serious. But man, reading their analysis felt like homework. Just super dry. Found myself skimming. Good stuff? Probably. Easy to understand? Nah, not really.
- Site Four: Big name. You know the type. Easy to navigate, odds looked fair compared to others. Found their prediction articles actually readable – explained why they picked Denmark for an upset or why England’s defence might hold strong. Hit a sweet spot between info and actually being engaging.
What Actually Happened? The Real Test!
So I basically watched the whole Euro 2020 unfold with these sites in mind. Kept track loosely. Remembered Italy? Yeah, Site Three totally called their grit early on. Site Four nailed some key upsets later in the tournament. Site One? Well, their super low odds on favorites sometimes paid… but they missed ALL the big surprises. Site Two? Eh, some wins, some losses, hard to tell if they were really special.
My Final Top Four (Based On My Messy Trial)
After the dust settled and Italy lifted the trophy (wtf, right?), here’s how my personal ranking shook out:
- Site Four (The Big Name): Won me over. Balance was best. Clear insights, good odds presentation, easy to use.
- Site Three (The Number Cruncher): Painful to read sometimes, but damn, they were often spot on. Real analysis.
- Site Two (The Smooth Talker): Looked great, felt modern… just couldn’t fully trust their “amazing” win rate claims.
- Site One (The Sketchy One): Honestly? Felt like real garbage. Low odds, no explanations. Avoid like the plague.
Phew. That was my afternoon gone. Learned it’s really a mix: look for actual reasoning behind picks, compare the odds they show, and seriously, trust your gut if something feels off. Don’t get dazzled by fancy charts OR super basic shouts. Wasted an entire day, but hey, found a couple I might peek at next big tournament.
